The Gentlemen Ranters site is a brilliant compendium of reminiscences of the great days of Fleet Street. – The Times


Issue # 145

May 7, 2010


This week

The intro-writing thread continues this week with a short from Derek Roylance, who started work on the old Rhyl Leader and was on the Rugeley Times, Staffordshire Advertiser, Express & Star and Lincolnshire Echo before emigrating to Oz where he became a PR for the army – a Lt-Col, no less.

Other pieces have been proposed on the subject of intros, but none has arrived yet. Maybe the would-be contributors are still trying to think of the best way in to writing the stuff.

Meanwhile, Geoffrey Mather has moved on to consider clichés, and their place (or not) in the newspaper world. Worth a read, because whatever you say about clichés, they have stood the test of time.

The sunshine island of San Serif didn’t qualify for the World Cup (soccer) this time, so it tends to pass us by. But for Ken Ashton, even a fleeting mention of it reminds him of the time his Mum’s fruit cake turned out to be the secret weapon that once put Korea 3 goals up against Portugal.

Even further back, memory man Stan Solomons recalls a murder on his patch, along with a detective who didn’t have a clue.

And Don Walker comes up against Anne Robinson (for overseas readers, she hosts a quiz show in the UK) and other loonies in the executive suite of the old Mirror building.

You can find them all by clicking on their names, above, or in the contents column over there on the left.

#


Sticky situation

By Derek Roylance

Reading Tom Brown’s piece on intros in Ranters last week reminded me of one of the best I have seen… and it was on a media release!

To set the scene. I and my good mate the late Bob Cornish were operating as captains in the Australian army’s Public Relations Service with the 1st Australian Task Force in South Vietnam in 1969.

The task force commander had visited the South Vietnamese general who commanded a division just to the north of our location. He gave him a gift of a boomerang.

A few days later, following a message from the general the Australian commander sent an Aboriginal soldier up to help the general out.

In writing the story, Bob Cornish began: ‘A Vietnamese General has a very Australian Problem… His boomerang won’t come back.’

Proof that it was a cracker came from the two resident journalists with the Task Force. They always changed any intro we put on a media release. On this occasion, with much gnashing of teeth, they admitted to being beaten.

Needless to say, after the visits by the Aboriginal Digger, the general’s problem went away.

#


Like the plague…

By Geoffrey Mather

As any writer knows, falling foul of a cliché is easy as pie. Annoying, too, which means that you tend to flip your lid, let the fur fly for Pete's sake, go through the roof, get your knickers in a twist, climb walls while your blood boils.

Publications live with clichés. Can they live without them? As one cliché dies, another is invented. Everyone recognises clichés, yet still they slide through the close mesh of newspaper and magazine control, a mutant disease with no apparent cure. There is a perverse logic in play here. Sub-editors fancy puns or near puns, and these are blood relatives of clichés. One breeds the other until they march as one.

Two recent, and typical, examples of catch-phrasing, or punning – ‘Shaken Federer vows to bounce back.’ And after a furrow was ploughed in protest at Israeli occupation: ‘Palestinian PM ploughs ahead with future state.’ Then, ‘To avoid being lost in the cloud, organisations need to indulge in some blue-sky thinking about their future ICT needs.’

When an entire football team went down with 'flu, somebody involved in production was heard saying, ‘Yea, fair enough, but what's the angle?’ Facts are all very well but those who write news schedules feel the need for a cliché of sorts, to bind fact and presentation together. It is like a doctor yearning for 'flu.

We have had dream homes (anything with more than three bedrooms), stockbroker belts (anything over four bedrooms), police with tracker dogs exercising their ‘long arm of the law’, detectives ‘proceeding as a result of information received’, Grannie Courage (who always fights off bag-snatchers), tycoons galore, and explosions in the home (for years after the war, ‘just like the Blitz’).

People in an earlier cliché tide did not die. They 'bought it.' They passed over, or away, or on, at which point they were laid to rest. We shall ‘never see their like again.’ The word 'cancer' was never spoken, only whispered. John Wayne called it the Big C.

Citizens had a gay time without being gays. If gays had a gay time they went to court. Police had moved on from being Peelers to being coppers, plods, Old Bill, and woodentops, and were yet to reach the inverted status of Filth.

People did not over-eat: they had ‘an elegant sufficiency’; and some of them munched. The word munch is an abomination, defined as ‘to chew steadily or vigorously, often audibly.’ It is an accident between crunch and lunch and my vision of a typical muncher is of a cow. The rallying cry of the twee restaurant might well have become ‘Munch lunch – five quid.’ There is less munching and more eating now and the world is better for it: It would be a mercy if the word, which is a cliché in its own right, were struck from the language.

People heading big businesses – ‘tycoons’ – tended to be linked with their products in headlines, as in Mr Bubbles (Cussons soaps in my case), or Mr Fireworks (used as a 60pt headline after a photographer wrote the words on the back of his picture as a joke).

Britain recruited foreigners after the war because three-shift working required their labour. A page one headline read, ‘Welcome, Mr Sunshine.’ That trend disappeared, thank heaven, otherwise we would have proceeded to Mr Raindrops, for prominent Mancunians.

We are now in the era of giants {gentle), angels (little), and heroes (modest), and the one thing binding this unlikely trio is that qualifiers have suffered some misfortune, usually terminal.

Rapping is a thing largely confined to cultural singing of a kind baffling to anyone over 40, but not all that long ago it was a required word in football – ‘Fergie raps refs.’ ‘Refs rap back.’ Most things were ‘par for the course’ and still are.

‘Who's rapping today?’ I used to ask our sports editor as I passed his desk in the morning.

Later, football manager after manager – and all without exception from a stockbroker belt – was to explain his purpose in virtually the same words: Eye on the ball. One game at a time. Keep focussed. All credit to the lads. On the day. At this moment in time. The defining moment. The rest is history. Level playing field. You couldn't invent it.

The words delivered in a mumbled monotone... Meanwhile, a few managers go ‘to hell and back’ in a difficult season.

Gobbledegook – the clichery of business – has thrived as never before. Plain English Campaign lists: ballpark figure; be proactive not reactive; bring it to the table; mission critical; move the goalposts; think outside the box; blue-sky thinking; pushing the envelope; there is no 'I' in team; win-win situation; client focus; deliverables; incentivise; take it to the next level.

Around 1981 I exchanged short and amiable words with Chrissie Maher, the woman behind the plain English movement. She had been demonstrating for her cause in London while Parliament was in session and a policeman intervened. ‘I never knew,’ she said, ‘what “in session” meant, but never mind. He had to read the whole document – 156 words – to tell us to go. I thought it was the best thing that ever happened.’

She said, 'Do you mean “Leave?”…’ And he said, 'Yes, damn you.’

If you want plain English you can't beat a war. The 1939-45 tiff in Europe did not do a lot for real estate and landscapes but it inspired sub-editors. They honed their trade ‘as never before’ because they didn't have much newsprint. Post-war, this ‘sharp focus’ persisted and I reckon that English newspapers were the leanest and most competent ‘to be found’ ‘anywhere in the world.’

I have seen three sub-editors apply themselves to one short, so that it became a shorter short than the last short short if you get my drift.

Headline: It was 120 degrees

Text: ... in Brighton yesterday.

They would have cut a full stop in half with a sharp knife if they could. With more newsprint came flabbier styles, and 80 per cent of my Sunday newspaper now goes to the bin unread because the content is not relevant to me.

In this flabbier era we need to re-discover unpolluted language. But of course, nobody will. Perhaps nobody can. Perhaps it is too late. We have ‘lost it.’ The cliché, the pun, and gobbledegook have triumphed.

Former Daily Express features editor and columnist Geoffrey Mather ploughs his own cliché-free furrow at www.northtrek.co.uk

#


Piece of cake

By Ken Ashton

Half-time in a World Cup soccer match, the crowd is going bananas, one team is smiling to the gods, the other looks shell-shocked. And my mother, bless her, is sitting in the stand and wondering whether to patent her fruit cake… created during World War Two.

Difficult to believe that a mere 15 years after the end of the Korean war and Mum panicking in case my National Service took me to the Far East, she would be sitting in the top tier stand at Goodison Park and cheering for the ‘little yellow men’, as she called them.

But to Mum’s fruit cakes, legends in their own lifetime and beyond. During WW 2, Dad worked on various ministry jobs as a ship’s carpenter in Liverpool, from patching up convoy ships and Royal Navy vessels to building Bailey Bridges for the invasion.

One day he came home from work with his trousers tucked into his socks, asked Mum for a newspaper, untied the tethers, shook himself and unloaded about two pounds of dried fruit. Smuggled out, a gift from Canadian sailors.

And Mum proceeded to bake the most fantastic fruit cake, using dried egg, gravy browning for colouring, saccharin instead of sugar and the smuggled fruit.

She produced, as if by magic, the most delicious fruit cake and once a month, from then on, she repeated the success.

Her link with Loyola Hall, a Jesuit retreat in Rainhill, a village 10 miles outside Liverpool, went back to the early 1900s. Born in 1908, she lost her own mother when she was six and for many years was helped by the nuns from Loyola Hall and St. Bart's church who brought her and her brothers and sisters baskets of food every day. Her Dad was the village bobby and her mum had been the village midwife, so her ties with the village and the church were strong.

So, there we were, in 1966, me covering the World Cup for the Daily Sketch with Billy Liddell, Liverpool and Scotland winger, at my side, me ghosting his comments and receiving a football education return.

And one morning, prior to taking Mum out to lunch, I popped in with her and Billy to Loyola Hall to watch the Koreans training. A most unlikely team to be in the World Cup finals, having beaten Australia to qualify. There were no diplomatic relations with the UK at the time and there were all sorts of problems about national anthems and flags on commemorative stamps. But here they were, as large or as little as life.

‘They look half-starved,’ was Mum’s verdict on the Korean soccer team.

And so she went home to bake them a fruit cake. And a couple of boxes of mini cakes as back-up.

They went down a storm. The Koreans insisted on visiting her, drowned her with flowers, gave her a Korean shirt, tickets for the match – and an open invitation to visit Korea.

Then to Goodison. Having beaten the mighty Italy, Korea were in the quarter-finals and facing Portugal. And by half-time, they were winning 3-0 and the world of soccer was stunned. Mum was praising her fruit cake as the Koreans' secret weapon and I was trying to write half-decent copy. Billy Liddell was laughing.

Then Eusebio spoiled the party with four second-half goals and Portugal nabbed another for a 5-3 win.

‘If they’d had a decent meal, they'd have lasted the 90 minutes,’ signed Mum.

‘You should have popped down at half-time with more cake,’ said Billy Liddell, with a broad wink.

#

Dab hand at murder

By Stan Solomons

Detectives probing the brutal killing of a kind old lady who ran a tiny corner shop thought it was only a matter of time before they tracked down the killer.

They had found a vital clue at the murder scene – a set of finger prints on a mantelpiece in the back room behind the shop in Halifax, just a few feet from where 84-year-old Emily Pye had been found battered to death.

It was the1950s and the Halifax borough police force had called in Scotland Yard as was the custom with murder cases in those days. The Yard sent Chief Supterintendent Hannam, one of its top detectives, who could hardly believe his luck.

Could the killer have been so stupid as to leave his finger prints? Hopefully they would soon find the answer. First they established they did not belong to the dead woman. Then one by one they eliminated close friends and relatives who visited Emily.

The next stage was to fingerprint scores of people who lived in the area and were customers of the old lady to see if their prints matched those at the murder scene. But before that plan was put into operation, the man who left his dabs behind came forward and confessed.

It was, believe it or not, the Chief Constable of Halifax, Mr Gerald Goodman. Apparently some time after the murder he had walked into the room and put his hand on the mantelpiece. Just to make sure that they were his dabs he had to have his fingerprints taken and it was then found they were a perfect match.

Hannam, known to his intimates as The Count because he was well spoken, wore smart clothes and had an impressive manner, revealed the Chief Constable’s gaffe at one of his daily press conferences. The story was, of course, off the record and never appeared in print – until now. I can still picture Mr Hannam chuckling as he told us the story.

‘We knew the Chief Constable couldn’t have committed the murder because he had a cast iron alibi’ he joked.

As it happened Hannam never solved the murder. He had a pretty good idea who had committed it but could never prove it.

#


Great truths of our time

By Donald Walker

'Don, you don't understand what I'm trying to do with this newspaper, do you?' Anne Robinson said to me one afternoon.

'No, Anne,' I replied (though these may not have been my exact words), 'I don't understand. Does anyone understand? Do you understand what you're trying to do with this newspaper?'

Well, all right, maybe I wasn't quite that acerbic with the Queen of Mean as she wasn't known in those days. But I never refrained from giving her as much lip as I could when I was chief sub and she was an assistant editor.

The myth that Anne ran us all ragged in the 1980s was far from true. I read in a Daily Mail profile that Mirror feature subs trembled at the sound of her footsteps. Rubbish. She was just one of the many crosses we had to bear and another good reason to drink too much. Don't even get me started on Chris Ward and Vic Mayhew...

Anne put up with as much editorial persiflage as she gave. She certainly made a nuisance of herself and tried to nag me crazy by making up editorial rules that no-one had heard of before, as though they were on tablets of stone handed out by some bloke with a long grey beard and lightning bolts up his jumper.

'Darling,' she said to me, 'the subs have written the headline from my last par.'

'And…?'

'There's no surprise for the reader if the last par's in the head, now is there, darling? That won't earn you brownie points.'

To be fair, Anne treated us well, took our insults with equanimity, frequently took us out for lunches on her exes (once, most of the subs' table to the Savoy) and consulted me with a fair amount of humility on points of grammar, syntax and style.

But that didn't stop her carping and uttering daft edicts. No sentences beginning with For… No trash in the TV pages... No stuff praising Joan Collins. (She hated Joan Collins.)

Making up new unbreakable rules was a terminal executive condition. Richard Stott, for example, who had never seen a dummy in his life before he was made features editor, started introducing all sorts of strange policy about what should appear where. His method of tackling any problem was to paw the ground, lower his horns and… CHARGE!

When he started to lecture high-mileage middle managers with lined, weary faces about 'value added extras' and 'high traffic-rate pages' they pretended they didn't know he had learnt these phrases in the Stab the night before and nodded wisely and encouragingly.

That's the way newspapers were. If the boss said it, it must be true. Well, up to a point, Lord Copper.

We all knew it was a way of asserting their egos... and fair enough. No doubt we would all have done something similar in the same circumstances. Yes-men agreeing with your every word is a powerful, addictive narcotic.

The problems came when somebody somewhere who ought to have known better let a drooling loony who wasn't aware his hair was on fire into the executive ward. Then things could get really nasty.

The worst case I can recall was told to me by a reporter on one of the Mirror titles. I am not going to identify the paper, the reporter or his boss. If you read on you'll see why.

The reporter covered a press conference about the abducted estate agent Suzy Lamplugh. The attractive 25-year-old had vanished in the summer of 1986 after leaving her office to show a 'Mr Kipper' a property.

Despite the pain she must have been suffering, her mother, Diana Lamplugh, put on a brave face and, in the hope of locating her daughter or at least her body, kept a high profile. Eventually she set up the Suzy Lamplugh Trust with the motto Live Life Safe to help and advise the vulnerable.

So the reporter checked his notebook and Biro, put on his jacket and started for the door. His news editor then called across the open editorial floor:

'Are you going to the Lamplugh conference?'

'Yes,' replied the scribbler.

'I'd like you to ask her a particular question.'

'Okay,' said the reporter fishing out his notebook.

'Can you ask Diana Lamplugh,' said the news editor before a roomful of journos who pretended they weren't listening, 'if she has considered there is a possibility her daughter has been abducted by aliens.'

In the stunned silence that followed the reporter could only manage: 'What?'

'Aliens, you know, like from Mars or Venus. Does she think they could have taken Suzy?'

The reporter looked deep into the face of his superior waiting for the gotcha line; he found only the deep, true gravitas of a loony dedicated to his work here among ordinary mortals.

'What on earth did you do?' I asked the reporter after he told me the story.

'I asked the question.'

'You did!'

'Yes. I was with a smudger and I didn't want the word getting back that I'd choked. Everyone on the floor had heard him.'

The reaction?

'Mrs Lamplugh just gave me a long, cold stare and went back to the business in hand.'

I spent much of my career reading loonies' letters, answering phone calls from loonies, going on missions devised by loonies and even interviewing the odd loony, but never met one to equal that.

Well, perhaps one.

P J Wilson was Mirrror news editor in the early 1980s and at the time one of his deputies was none other than my old pal Brian 'Bosie' Sutherland, the well-known supersub and top newspaper designer.

P J gathered Brian and various other assistant news editors around the newsdesk one Friday in February and said: 'Okay, I want at least five fresh ideas from each of you. Something visionary, something sparkling – and I want them by Monday.'

Muttering to themselves, the assembled crew broke up and set off for the usual weekend of drinkin', smokin' and funnin'.

Come Monday morning, somewhat bleary-eyed and hung over after too much fun, they reassembled at the desk.

'Well?' said P J, the new news editor.

'Well what?' said Bosie.

'Five sparkling ideas – each. Where are they?'

The assistants looked at one another hopelessly; Bosie lit a fag and wondered how long it was before the Stab opened. He couldn't even remember being asked for sparkling ideas the previous Friday and he certainly didn't have any. After all, this was a newsdesk. It dealt with the news.

'Christ! Must I do everything?' said P J crossly. 'Well, here's the kind of thing I'm looking for: it's Valentine's Day this week and I want to get a laser gun that can be fired at the Moon.'

A clammy Monday morning horror stole into the hearts of all assembled.

'I want,' continued the imperturbable P J, 'to get the laser gun to write "I love you" on the Moon and then surround it with a heart.'

No-one was quite prepared to tell him his hair was on fire, but some brave soul did say: 'Don't think it can be done, boss.'

P J flew into a rage. 'That is exactly the kind of negative thinking I don't want to hear. Just bloody find me someone, an expert, who can organise this. It's simple enough. A laser gun. The Moon. A Valentine's Day message, for God's sake.'

Shoulders slumped, the newsdeskers dispersed in despair to various points of the compass most of which seemed to be pointing at public-houses.

Bosie, however, applied science to this monstrous tumescence that had grown in the brain of his leader. When dealing with someone who is evidently barmy what is the answer? he asked himself.

Water extinguishes fire. Chalk abates acid. Oil settles troubled waters. One science correspondent draws the sting of a cuckoo news editor. It's obvious... science is the answer.

So Arthur Smith was wheeled before the baleful glare of P J.

Arthur was a tall, mournful character who lived to shatter myths and shine the searing beam of true knowledge on hoi polloi. There was no common misconception Arthur hadn't righted on the Mirror. Cold weather makes you ill? Nonsense! A dog's mouth is cleaner than a human's? Rubbish! You can't get pregnant if you do it standing up? Bollocks!

'If you aim a laser at the Moon, it will reach the surface but will be too small and weak to be used with any accuracy,' Arthur intoned. 'Remember the Moon is 250,000 miles from the Earth and this tiny beam would have to be able to dig trenches many miles deep: otherwise the result would not be seen from Earth. It would have to shift thousands of tons of Moon dust and deposit them – but where? Quite apart from the intricacy of such a task, it would take immense strength to wield such a device, quite beyond the capabilities of our technology and the power required to maintain such penetration would be...'

And so Arthur trundled on.

P J flew into another terrible rage. But, well, you can't fight science no matter how important you are on Earth or how many yes-men tell you you're right. It's one of the great truths of our time.

#



Keep up to date with Ranters

If you are not already on our journalists' mailing list, and want to be reminded when the site is updated, send your name and email address to

rantersreaders@gmail.com

Use the same link if you have recently changed your email address.

We do not send any other emails and do not share the address list with anybody.

The Gentlemen Ranters site is a brilliant compendium of reminiscences of the great days of Fleet Street. - The Times


Issue # 146

May 14, 2010


This week

All you need to know about getting into newspapers and becoming a successful tabloid hack is available in one racy new autobiography, says Harold Heys. So (even though it's written by somebody we've never actually heard of) we offer it for the enlightenment of all those media lecturers out there who might want to pass on the knowledge to their eager students.

Heys met the author when she wandered into the front office of the paper he was working for. 'Go and see the woman in the front hall' was the command we all dreaded, recalls Bill Greaves.

But he went, interviewed a reader, and changed the make-up of the Daily Mail Front Page - and his own career - for many years thereafter.

Of course, there were worse places than the front hall in which the olden day reporter could find himself. Like the Savoy Grill, with the proprietor, as Alan Whittaker reports.

#


All you need to know

By Harold Heys

It was about 20 years ago but I clearly remember the receptionist popping her nose round the door of the editorial department – she never ventured further – to announce: ‘Two giggly girls at the front. They want to be reporters.’

Manchester had fizzled out and I was back in the sticks helping to run a thriving group of weeklies. It was a busy day. ‘Tell ’em to ...’ She didn’t wait for the rest and disappeared. A few minutes later she was back: ‘They’re keen. And they’ve stopped giggling.’

I don’t know why, but I told her: ‘Go on, then. Throw ’em in.’

And that was Sharon Marshall’s first look inside a newspaper office. Many more were to follow as she carved a ten-year swathe through most of the national red-tops before finally, and reluctantly, falling out of love with the game. Now she has looked back to those hectic years of her youth in a new book Tabloid Girl. Piers Morgan describes it as ‘a hilarious and gossipy book’ and adds: ‘Thank God she never worked for me!’

Well, she did work for me and my pal Brian Caven, the former Express sub; not for long and only churning out work experience crap for a line of brandy and Babycham before we pointed her south, gave her a kick up the backside and told her: ‘Go get ’em girl!’

She did just that.

A few months ago I was glancing through lists of ‘required reading’ for students of journalism both here and the USA. God, give me strength. By the time ‘meeja’ kids have waded through most of them they would have been put off for life. Of course, it rather depends on what they want, one day, to specialise in. But for anyone fancying the cut and thrust of the tabloids – that’s every single one of them, I suppose – this book is probably all they need. And if they aren’t put off when they’ve finished it, well, Good Luck.

The publisher’s blurb reads like a standfirst for a Daily Dump three-pager:

In this true and hilariously honest memoir, the former tabloid hack confesses how she:

• Kidnapped Jade Goody’s mother.

• Went undercover at swinging parties.

• Broke into the Friends set – and accidentally landed a role.

• Dodged death threats from pop stars.

• Got bollocked by Bruce Forsyth.

• Hired hookers.

• Hassled the Hoff.

• And really, really pissed off Jeremy Paxman

How to make your excuses in S&M dungeons? Yes, that’s in there. How to capture a mythical beast with just a lamb shank? Yes, of course. How to rifle through A-listers’ undies drawers? Yes, yes. How to find belly dancers in strange countries in the dead of night? Yaaawn. How to survive a feature on colonic irrigation. Puh-leese! And the big one: How to get a start on the tabloids when you’ve little experience, the only name in your contacts book is Roland Rat whom you once interviewed for your college mag, and you don’t have much idea about How It All Works? Yes, yes, yes!

Sharon Marshall bombarded one news editor with phone calls and then rolled up lugging crates of lager as her calling card. Probably for a laugh he gave her a casual shift the next day. This, she explains for readers who may not be conversant with the odd ways of newspapers, is basically a legalised form of slave labour. ‘As a casual shifter you have no rights and absolutely no idea what Hell will be unleashed on you that day.’ Perhaps one shifter in a hundred will make it to a Staff Job. ‘You have to wait until the previous occupant either gets promoted, poached, fired, rehabbed, carried out in a wooden box or, and this happens only very occasionally, makes it through to a happy retirement.’ Oh, and the pay’s crap.

A few experienced hacks occasionally offered advice in gloomy corners of Fleet Street pubs. Here was one of them waxing lyrical: ‘Imagine that you are writing for a four-year-old with a shorter-than-average attention span, absolutely no memory recall and a total obsession with other people’s love lives and bra sizes, and you will get it about right.’ And never be afraid to give a tale a bit of ‘tabloid top-spin’. Or, as she explains for non-hacks: ‘Make it all up.’

How many ‘required reading’ hardback tomes on journalistic mores are as succinct as that?

Sharon Marshall has taken very few liberties with her book. The tabloids she worked on have been encapsulated into one and colleagues’ names and a few dates have been changed. But, as she says: ‘It’s all true!’ She gradually fell out of love with the game after ten exhausting years but, she says of the hacks she worked with and against: ‘I loved them all. Every single double-crossing, devious, scheming, cunning, ruthless, messed-up, brilliantly evil one of them.’ She’d promised she’d get me in there somewhere.

She has a nice line on the various editorial departments. Sports reporters are really quite jolly and get to go off to the football all the time. Showbiz desks are peopled by ‘a liver-hardened lot who lead a vampiric existence in darkened night-time bars,’ asking questions like: ‘Ere. What’s all this about Ulrika?’ Then there’s the Royal beat ‘full of nice toffs in three-piece suits and with three-piece names.’ Politics is also ‘jolly,’ with all those comfortable Commons sofas to crash out on and Fashion is nice, too. ‘Full of lots of lovely, thin girls in high heels and with bouncy, shiny hair.’

Being a columnist on Features looked particularly magical to the impressionable young wannabe. ‘You get paid stacks and get to have a never-ageing photograph of yourself printed at the top of your column – heavily airbrushed and wrinkle free. To make the point she adds: ‘The first time I saw Julie Burchill I thought it was her mother.’ Ouch!

There is one more place in the editorial geography. Right, right back at the end of the reporters’ room, there’s a dimly-lit corner under a layer of grime. No one ever goes over there by choice, she explains. It’s peopled by odd, shadowy figures and is known as Investigations. And, yes, that’s where she was sent.

Sharon hung on, occasionally by her fingertips, and finally landed a coveted staff job. New shifters came wide-eyed through the doors of various offices. By this time her drinking was approaching Olympic proportions and they used to greet her in Oddbins ‘like family’. The new recruits always stood out, she recalled. ‘They look sort of shiny, new, thin and clean. After a few years we all looked a bit fuzzy round the edges and had gone a bit grey.’

Eventually, after numerous scrapes and a disastrous love-life, Sharon migrated to Showbiz where she immediately found her niche and now she happily chats away about the latest soap meanderings on ITV1’s popular This Morning show.

Why did she fall out of love with tabloid journalism after those ten wild years? The line between what was acceptable and what was not was being crossed too often. Why? Was it because of the looming deadlines, the desperation to keep the job or the desperation to pay the rent, or perhaps because it’s easy in the cascade of stories to lose sight of the impact those tales can have on the people involved. ‘Sometimes we bullied people. Sometimes we goaded them. Occasionally, just occasionally, Fleet Street just doesn’t know when to stop the spinning. Good men behave like total tossers.’

I haven’t recounted any of this book’s wonderful tales and have steered clear of the cutting pen-portraits which she paints so mischievously. I don’t want to spoil the fun. Experienced hacks should buy the book if only to bring back a few fond memories and see if they can recognise anyone in it. A variation on an old theme: Spot the Hack. Any ‘meeja’ students with wild delusions should buy it to see just what they’re up against as they try to break into what used to be The Greatest Game. Is it still? ’Fraid not, kids. Oh, and the pay’s still crap.

Sharon Marshall now lives in London and is engaged to Bruce Davidson, a great bloke who is a Squadron Corporal Major in the Life Guards. They marry in September. She was staff for the News of the World as TV editor, the Sunday People as a columnist and showbiz reporter, the Daily Express and Sunday Express (showbusiness reporter), the Daily Star (reporter), Daily Star Sunday (TV critic) and, after quitting reporting, she was a columnist for The Sun with the No Sex In the City column. Other papers she shifted on in the early days included the Evening Standard (Londoner's Diary) and The Times. She’s also had features in the Daily Mail and in various magazines. Tabloid Girl is published today by Sphere at £6.99 although there’s a special 30% offer at amazon, if you’re quick.

#


I suppose you think that’s funny

By William Greaves

It all started with the command we all dreaded: ‘Go and see a woman in the front hall.’

This meant that there was someone down there who wanted the Daily Mail to put the world to rights. Or someone who wanted us to write the story she didn’t have time to write herself. Or maybe even somebody who had just received a one-to-one tip off about the ending of the world.

Any road, as we used to say in Pontefract, there was a lady down there that the front reception desk didn’t know what to do with. And it bode ill.

Nor were the first words of the lady in the green felt hat particularly encouraging. ‘It’s about my gas oven,’ she began.

And from that moment it got steadily better.

Mrs Edna Freemantle, aged 43, had recently bought a cooker at the gas showrooms. Only the oven door kept coming open when it was meant to be shut. The Gas Board would send a man round. Which it did.

The man in the van explained that this particular cooker had two versions and Mrs Freemantle needed a different door, which he duly unloaded.

But the man in the van was not the fitter. The fitter would call that very afternoon.

The fitter turned up on a bicycle. It took him only a couple of minutes to discover that the new door exactly matched the defective door. It was again the wrong door. But he couldn’t take it away because he was on a bicycle. It went into Mrs Freemantle’s garage.

Next day, the man in the van delivered a third door. He had, however, no instruction to take away the previous two. And that afternoon the fitter again arrived on his bicycle...

Interval.

‘So how many doors do you now have in your garage, Mrs Freemantle?’ ‘Twelve.’

‘And they are all the wrong door?’ ‘Yes.’

‘And where now is your car?’ ‘On the street.’

The story next morning ran the length of the end column on the front page. That afternoon Mrs Freemantle received a whole new oven – and a new fridge to go with it. And from all over the country came letters of similarly unimaginable retail misfortunes.

The End Column of the Daily Mail became a permanent feature – with Greaves its apparently permanent author.

Great stories at home and abroad took my colleagues to distant parts of the globe – Basingstoke, Bridgewater or even Bahrain – but me, I went nowhere. ‘Best stay here, Bill,’ I was told, ‘in case something funny turns up.’

So began a couple of years at the sharp end of the irrelevant, the unimportant and the incontrovertibly trivial.

One by one, the intros followed each other into the library archives...

The mud of Southend seafront provided an ideal opportunity for the Army to get stuck in. Which it duly did. And that provided entertainment yesterday for a large crowd watching a £130,000 Army tank trying to pull out a £40,000 Army bulldozer which had been trying to pull out a £21,000 Army recovery vehicle which in turn had been trying to pull out a garage truck which never meant to be there in the first place.

Or again

It was just a little embarrassing, but old Joe Lee, 56, took over his new duties without any real misgivings. After all, if you’ve been a men’s lavatory attendant for four years the problems of taking over the ‘ladies’ as well are not too great. The broadening of Joe’s interest was not, however, taken nearly so readily by the 200 women at the Bangor, North Wales, factory of Denis Ferranti (Meters) Ltd, and they voted yesterday for strike action if the matter was not put right...

Or

There are 170,000 other ranks in the British Army. So could the Ministry of Defence please explain how it managed to come by 800,000 surplus pairs of boots?

‘I feel very strongly about this,’ Mr Harry Howarth, Labour MP for Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, said yesterday. ‘I represent a constituency prominently concerned with boot and shoe manufacture and the sudden appearance on the market of 800,000 Army surplus boots would seriously damage the prospects of an industry already suffering serious competition from Eastern European imports.’

Or

The landlords of 43a, Ovington Square, Chelsea, have fairly fixed ideas as to who should live in 43a, Ovington Square, Chelsea. And notable absentees from the list of acceptable residents are ducks. Now Australian actor Rod Taylor, one of the current occupiers of 43a, Ovington Square, has received a letter stating in admirably simple terms ‘Your duck must go.’ Mr Taylor, still dressed for action as a Congo mercenary in MGM’s Dark of the Sun, took a suitably belligerent line. ‘If Duck goes, I go,’ he said yesterday.

Or yet again

Four baboons and a black ape were having a swinging time in Margate last night after a mass walk out from the monkey house in Safari Wild Animal Park. It could have been worse. Three more baboons, four pigtail monkeys and another black ape also escaped – but after a brief look at the outside world decided to stick with the devil they knew.

The very last edition before I finally sought a new life elsewhere (probably assisted by men in white coats) contained on its front page my spectacular swansong – accompanied by a picture of a car sinking into the River Derwent, with its lady learner driver and gentlemen test examiner clutching each other for balance on the roof.

The epic began, as nearly as I can remember, with the words: Mrs (name and age supplied) was forced to abandon her driving test in midstream yesterday. Because midstream was precisely where she happened to be at the time.

But even a life dedicated to the pursuit of the unquestionably inconsequential can contain anguished hours spent bemoaning The Ones that Got Away.

Try as I might, there were just two merry moments that never saw the light of day.

In its early years. Emmerdale Farm was filmed on location in the remote valley of Littondale in the Yorkshire Dales National Park. But when the national hobby of snatching photographs of the fictional homes of fictional TV characters finally drove the besieged real life residents to open revolt, Yorkshire Television moved the soap’s backdrop to the unlikely Aire Valley village of Esholt, a mere stone’s throw from the bustling streets of Leeds.

When, after a longish period of time, the secret finally got out and the coaches started pouring in, the natives were this time philosophically welcoming. The landlord of the Commercial Inn, which once a week changed its sign to The Woolpack, enjoyed a heaven-sent boost to his takings. The village shop did a roaring trade in Emmerdale pencils, Emmerdale diaries and Emmerdale just-about-everything-else and the villagers themselves seemed to enjoy saying goodbye to years of anonymity.

Esholt, however, contains only one farm – and here alone the welcome was less than enthusiastic. Half way up the driveway my photographer colleague and I were overjoyed to come across a sign which proclaimed in large and unambiguous letters: THIS IS NOT EMMERDALE FARM – F*** OFF! (Or it would have thus proclaimed if the farmer had managed to lay his hands on any asterisks.)

No matter how eloquently I beseeched the back bench, how many asterisks I offered or however blurred the sign appeared on the picture, Daily Mail readers never got to share in the wonders of this particular feature of the Esholt landscape.

On another occasion, the office powers-that-be were fascinated to learn from some source or other how playground jokes were somehow able to transmit themselves around the country so that whatever had the kids in stitches in Southampton on Monday was cracking them up in Cleethorpes by Tuesday morning.

Your fearless correspondent, armed with map and notebook, was sent the length and breadth of the land to investigate. Several days of faithfully recording primary and prep school humour were beginning to wear decidedly thin when the moment of joy struck without warning.

A small band of volunteer children had been assembled in the dining room of a North London primary school. With two teachers in loco parentis, one by one they delivered their less-than-rib-tickling jests.

Until:

‘What’s the difference between a pregnant woman and a lamp bulb?’ demanded 9-year-old Fiona. ‘I don’t know, Fiona,’ I said unsuspectingly, while scribbling the question into my notebook. ‘You can unscrew a lamp bulb,’ announced Fiona with a satanic giggle.

One teacher coughed loudly, the other just saved herself from falling off her stool, I manfully tried not to burst out laughing and – you’ve guessed it – that one never got into the paper either.

Ah well, you’ve got to lose a few...

#


Silenced knight

By Alan Whittaker

They assembled around 6pm shortly after the Falstaff, the cavernous Fleet Street hostelry which served as the News of the World annexe, opened for the evening stampede.

Sir William Carr, the chairman of the Screws, occupied his usual position by the entrance from where he could scrutinise new arrivals with the baleful stare that a bottle of Johnny Walker Red Label invariably induced. A basilisk-like look it had all the frivolity of a mediaeval death mask. Ranged alongside was the towering figure of Mark Chapman-Walker, the saturnine managing director of the Bouverie Street circus, in his long black overcoat with the cunningly concealed pockets his hands could never quite locate when a barmaid priced a round.

Stafford Somerfield, the paper’s rotund editor, stood next to Graham Stanford, columnist and conviviality convenor and Noyes Thomas the globetrotting reporter who had been on the staff of the Screws since the 1930s completed the discussion group. During the Second World War Tommy – as he was always known – served with the Ghurkhas and became the youngest Lieutenant Colonel in the Army a fact that rather rankled the outranked but ennobled chairman of the NoW who somehow managed to make captain.

Tommy was the nephew of the poet Alfred Noyes whose imaginative mastery of words delighted thousands of children who read his most popular narrative composition, The Highwayman. As a contender for a literary prize Tommy’s latest contribution to the News of the World was not quite in that category, but nevertheless it was eagerly devoured by millions. His assignment had been to chronicle the life story of sex swap model April Ashley, born George Jamieson. The paper’s readers were not only told about the life style of the former mode, which included a bit part in the Bing Crosby, Bob Hope, Dorothy Lamour film The Road to Hong Kong, but given a lurid cut and stitch description of the operation in Casablanca which made the transformation possible.

Women had always found Tommy attractive and to his undisguised alarm his languid charm seemed to have worked on the newly reconstituted Miss Ashley. He created such a favourable impression that when it was announced that she planned to ‘marry’ into the aristocracy, Tommy, as a friend of the bride, was detailed to cover the ceremony.

He flew to Gibraltar where he was introduced to the bridegroom, the Hon Arthur Corbett, the sexually indeterminate offspring of Lord Rowallan who was World Chief Scout from 1945 to 1959. The Rowallan money came from custard powder and the Hon Arthur, later to become the 3rd Baron Rowallan, was a nephew of Jo Grimond, leader of the Liberal Party. Because the guest list for the ceremony was somewhat sparse Tommy found his services were required. Not only did he act as the best man but he also gave away the ‘bride’. (Forget talking dogs, Colin Dunne would have loved this one)

Unsurprisingly Tommy was rather anxious to conceal this, and similar episodes in his journalistic career. He had recently been appointed political editor of the News of the World and he reckoned his credentials in the Palace of Westminster might not be enhanced if such matters came to light.

Indeed it was in his new capacity that he had been ‘invited’, much to his dismay, to join the coterie in the Falstaff where politics and Britain’s role on the world stage were being discussed and Sir William was well into his second bottle of Red Label, the first having been demolished during the lunchtime ‘conference’. Sir William was of the opinion that the Prime Minister, the former14th Earl of Home, he of the Hirsel, was a country bumpkin. Or something phonetically similar but a few syllables shorter.

One thing was transparently obvious; the fellow was an idiot. There were times when it was diplomatically wise to agree with Sir William and his view was readily accepted by the courtiers. The Falstaff began to fill with inferior, garrulous groups and it was time to vacate the annex.

Next stop the News of the World ‘canteen’. Otherwise known as the Savoy Grill. They were conducted to ‘the usual table’ and as if my magic a bottle of Johnny Walker Red Label appeared.

Around 9.30 Graham Stanford had the misfortune, while fumbling in his jacket pocket, to ignite a box of matches and the acrid smell of smouldering wool gradually mingled with the aroma of grilled steaks. Diners coughed and cast irritated glances at the NoW party as black smoke wreathed their table. Amid the coughing and frantic hand waving prompt action with a soda siphon by the editor saved the situation from becoming undignified. Stanford’s drenched jacket was rigorously checked before he was curtly dismissed and despatched home in disgrace.

Around 10.30 as the third bottle of Red Label arrived Sir William’s mood was approaching the Belligerent mark on his behavioural barometer. He thought the idiot Prime Minister should be told how to run the country. “Get him on the phone’ he instructed his new political editor. Tommy left the table and went for a long piss hoping that by the time he returned the command would have been forgotten. He was wrong.

Around 11 – by which time the barometer had left Belligerent, sailed past the Menacing mark and was now touching Maniacal – Sir William demanded to know what had happened to the phone call to Downing Street. A thoroughly disconsolate Tommy realised action was called for and rang the duty Press officer. He explained the situation and was told – rather aptly – ‘Stay tight and I’ll phone back.’

Tommy returned to the fray to find a telephone had been placed on the table and another bottle of Red Label had been added to the tab. Sir William was now in his Henry VIII mode and at his most unpredictable. All he lacked was a pen and a pile of death warrants awaiting his signature. Tommy stared at the phone as if in a hypnotic trance waiting for the call from Downing Street. Sod politics and Westminster, an evening with April Ashley was preferable to this.

On ploughed Sir William.

The chirp-chirp of the phone stopped him in mid sentence. The silence was broken by another chirp. All eyes were focussed on the phone and then on Tommy as he took the call. ‘The Prime Minister will see your delegation at Number Ten at 9.30 in the morning. That’s today,’ said the Press officer.

‘About time too,’ snorted Sir William when informed of the arrangement.

Around 9.25 am they met in Downing Street. A strangely subdued quartet who conversed sparingly in mumbles and sighs. More like strangers at a funeral. Their leader, so vociferous a few hours earlier, was now William the Silent. He brought up the rear as they were led, a line of shuffling sacrificial lambs, through a labyrinth of corridors into a large room where four hard backed chairs had been placed, interrogation style, in a row before a table.

A shell-shocked reflective Noyes Thomas shuddered as he painted the scene for me over a couple of pints that lunchtime.

A phalanx of stern faced civil servants faced them. Some had notebooks and poised ballpoints ready to make notes of any scandal the News of the World had uncovered that was likely to bring down the Government. Profumo and Vassall were all too recent.

At the table looking like a perplexed tortoise sat the PM, the former 14th Earl of Home, now disinterred as Sir Alex Douglas-Home. He peered at his guests through half-moon spectacles and said, very politely: ‘Gentlemen I understand you were rather anxious to get in touch with me during the early hours of this morning. Now how can I help you?’

Not a cheep.

Stafford Somerfield and Tommy exchanged resigned glances. ‘This was Carr’s idea let him do the talking,’ seemed to be the unspoken pact.

Sir William, head bowed, was clearly more interested in the pattern of the carpet. After glancing at his companions and seeing nothing but abject discomfort Mark Chapman-Walker gallantly stood up. At some stage in his career he had been an influential figure at Conservative Central Office and he was acquainted with the Prime Minister. ‘First of all may I say how grateful we are that you could spare the time to grant us this audience’ he lied.

The PM nodded. ‘What precisely concerns the News of the World that is so important its proprietor and editor wish to converse with me around midnight?’

Chapman-Walker’s nudge on Sir William’s shoulder went unheeded. The noble knight’s attention was firmly focussed on his shoes.

‘It’s the international situation.’ Chapman-Walker’s reply was drenched in desperation.

A flourish of ballpoints as the question was duly noted by the squad of suits behind the PM.

‘Rather an extensive subject’ mused Sir Alec. ‘Any particular aspect of the international situation?’

Chapman-Walker was drowning. And his companions were not going to throw a lifeline. ’The Middle East’ he croaked. ‘We understand there have been extensive troop movements in the last 24 hours.’

Behind the PM the pens were busy. Middle East, troop movements, what have these bastards got on the Government?

Sir Alec then gave a succinct outline of British policy in the Middle East for a couple of minutes before pausing and removing his glasses. The penny had tumbled. ‘Have I been able to allay your fears?’ he smiled. ‘Are there any other points you wish to raise?’

Chapman-Walker leaned across Sir William who shook his head. His only question was an unspoken ‘How the hell do we get out of here?’ Stafford Somerfield and Tommy shook their heads in unison.

It was a brisker, relieved Chapman-Walker who stood up and said ‘No Prime Minister. We are completely satisfied.’

The Prime Minister glanced at the clock. The meeting had lasted less than 20 minutes. ‘In that case gentlemen would you care for a drink before you depart?’

The mention of drink had a galvanising Lazarus-like effect on Sir William the instigator of the meeting. He transferred his attention from the floor and spoke for the first time. ‘A large Scotch’ he said,

They re-assembled at l0.30 am shortly after the Falstaff opened for the lunchtime stampede. Sir William occupied his usual position by the entrance. He began: ‘I like the Prime Minister, he seems to be a splendid fellow…’

Alan Whittaker (Darwen Advertiser, Darwen News and the Blackburn-based Northern Daily Telegraph) was a News of the World staffman for 37 years as reporter, sub, columnist,TV critic…

#





The Gentlemen Ranters site is a brilliant compendium of reminiscences of the great days of Fleet Street. – The Times


Issue # 147

21 may 2010


This Week

In an essay written in 1969 called Stop The Press I Want To Get On, Nicholas Tomalin (you’ve read it here several times before) wrote that ‘The only qualities essential for real success in journalism are rat-like cunning, a plausible manner and a little literary ability.’

As a matter of fact, we think that ‘rat-like cunning’ was actually coined by our old friend Murray Sayle, but the rest is Tomalin’s.

And there was more to it than that, of course.

There were other, less-essential, qualities, he said: ‘A knack with telephones, trains and petty officials; a good digestion and a steady head; total recall; enough idealism to inspire indignant prose…

‘…a paranoid temperament; an ability to believe passionately in second-rate projects; well-placed relatives; good luck; the willingness to betray, if not friends, acquaintances; a reluctance to understand too much too well (because tout comprendre c’est tout pardonner and tout pardonner makes dull copy);…’

‘…an implacable hatred of spokesmen, administrators, lawyers, public-relations men, politicians and all those who would rather purvey words than policies; and the strength of character to lead a disrupted personal life…’

The ‘knack with telephones’ may have changed, but has much else?

In a thoughtful piece in The Times this week, Ed Caesar reports that there are still thousands of kids every year desperate to stop those presses and crash in.

Crash in, not cash in. The average journalist’s salary, he says, is £24,500. You wonder whey they bother (or you may read their stuff and think they're overpaid). Click on the link to read the full piece.

Will they find anything resembling a free lunch? Mike Gallemore did. At least… it was always free for somebody.

Talking of which, whose round is it? Bill Greaves has been mooching around Fleet Street for long enough to know that there are no rules. So, wisely, he wrote some.

Cheers.

#

No such thing…

By Michael Gallemore

Whoever coined the phrase, ‘there’s no such thing as a free lunch’ couldn’t have worked in national newspapers.

I remember when we lowly chapel officials invited Percy Roberts out for a long lunch in Manchester to celebrate his retirement as chairman. We certainly pushed the boat out on his behalf as we swapped sordid tales of negotiating skulduggery with Percy and his management colleagues.

At the end of the festivities Percy made a heartfelt thank you speech which ended with: ‘I’ve never questioned your generosity or integrity but I’m sure the cost of this binge will appear somewhere on your exes over the next couple of weeks and I’ll end up paying for my own farewell.’

To which, fairly predictably, somebody (Louis Yaffa, I think) retorted: ‘It’ll be there but I bet you can’t find it.’

When I was talking about Harry Conroy with an old friend recently we had a laugh about another notable ‘free lunch’ back in the seventies. But this one went horribly wrong.

It was at an NUJ ADM at Ilkley in Yorkshire. Most ADMs, as far as I could see, were little more than an excuse for a piss-up. Harry was one of only two or three people who took them seriously and he was in good form at Ilkley.

There was a restaurant in town called the Box Tree, which had just found fame by being awarded a rare second Michelin star. One of the guys from the Glasgow branch who worked on the Record came up with a great idea: On behalf of all the Mirror Group NUJ delegates he would invite the Mirror management team who were attending the ADM to dinner at the Box Tree. He reckoned that he’d got the nod from Hugh Curry, the editorial manager at the Record and Mail in Glasgow, that the MGN management would pick up the tab.

Our Glasgow brother put the word around that it was freebies at the Box Tree from 8.0pm until fall-over time. Around 20 of us from London, Manchester and Glasgow, nicely suited and booted, duly assembled at the bar. We immediately launched ourselves at the most expensive of whatever was going, as was the form in such cases.

Tony Boram, Hugh Curry, Peter Moorhead and I think Duncan Lamont represented the management and the evening developed into a really good do. Naturally, we all went for the most exotic and expensive items on the menu, except for Keith Meadows, who had his usual waiter dispute when he ordered double egg and chips. I’ve dined with Keith at some of the best restaurants in Britain over the years and I’ve seldom seen him order anything that a five-year-old wouldn’t eat.

Double egg and chips for Keith is quite adventurous for him. When the waiter explained that they didn’t have that dish on the menu, Keith protested, ‘Call yourself a Michelin two-star restaurant and you can’t cook double egg and chips?’

Eventually, Keith got his dinner and demolished it in a matter of seconds, while the rest of us were still working our way through the second of four or five courses, quaffing merrily away at the dearest wines they had. (Keith was on the wagon at the time for health reasons.)

At the end of the evening a smiling Hugh Curry tapped his glass with a spoon, stood up, and said something like: ‘The great thing about Mirror Group is that we can have the most ferocious disputes and negotiations but, underneath, we remain good friends. The fact that you have collectively invited the four of us here to this wonderful dinner is an excellent example of that overall friendship and goodwill, and, on behalf of the management I’d like to say thank you.’

You could have cut the atmosphere with a knife. All eyes turned to our brother from Glasgow, who got up out of his seat and headed for the bar, quickly followed by the rest of us.

A heated discussion followed, while the brother totted up the bill. With an apologetic but straight face he said: ‘OK lads, sorry that didn’t work. I make that around forty-seven quid apiece – but I’ll get them to break it up into individual bills for your exes.’ Which the Box Tree refused to do.

Suddenly, an angry voice shouted out: ‘Forty-seven quid for double egg and chips? – It’s a disgrace!’

#

Short arms, deep pockets

By William Greaves

There is one familiar expression in the English language which appears in no international phrase book – for the simple reason that foreigners would be able to make neither head nor tail of it.

The phrase is: ‘It’s my round.’ It has a number of variations: the assertive ‘No, no, it’s definitely my round’, the quizzically aggrieved ‘Whose round is it?’ and even the faintly aggressive ‘It can’t be my round again, surely.’

When two or more people assemble to quench their thirst in a public place anywhere east of Dover or west of the Scillies, a bill is pushed under the saucer each time a new batch of drinks arrives. Or a beer mat is marked, slate chalked or spike spiked. Upon departure, the final tally is then added up and divided among all present. Fair – but unsporting.

No nation which invented cricket could seriously be expected to comply with a code of conduct so morosely bereft of complication that all the niceties of lifemanship and etiquette are swamped by simple arithmetic. So the difference between the British pub and every other kind of alien bar is that, here, we pay before we sip. Correction: one person pays before everyone sips.

So the British pub – and the atmosphere which prevails within – is unique in so much as every new order is a personal gift by one patron to all his or her friends or colleagues.

But who is that one patron? Here is the nub around which the very British game of ‘pubbing’ revolves. For not only is the ‘round’ (defined in my Collins Concise as ‘a number of drinks bought at one time for a number of people’) deeply engrained in the national ethos, it is also deliciously ill-defined in the matter of whose turn it is to dig deep.

There was a time, before bitter gave way to Budweiser, when such a question would never have had to be asked. Tyro drinkers would be so overawed by their surroundings – and the dangers that lurked within – that they would nervously ape their experienced elders. In other words, they would learn by natural instinct when it was their turn to put hand in pocket.

Some years ago, in the days when newspapers lived in Fleet Street and the round often assumed titanic dimensions, I became aware that standards were falling. Appalling laxities like tossing a coin or engaging in a game of spoof in order to determine who should pay were creeping in to replace the proper order of things. Some players even sank to the unpardonable depths of ‘round avoidance,’ arriving late, enjoying several drinks and then, in the nick of time, spotting someone across the room with whom they ‘must just grab a word.’

It was not entirely the young students’ fault. A new and impetuous generation may well have sprung, improperly dressed, upon the scene – but who can learn when the teachers have forgotten how to teach? In those darkest hours, I realised that The Word had to be spread before a glorious national heritage was allowed to wither on the vine.

The result of this initiative became known throughout the pubs in that street of shame as Greaves’s Rules. Under their auspices not only were rounds ordered but tribunals commissioned and even sentences passed. Once-respected men today walk shoeless down Oxford Street for having transgressed against them.

It was a fragile claim to eponymous immortality – and certainly not one I sought to patent in documentary form – but this website has now invited me to publish those same edicts as a reminder that nothing in our history is so sacred that it cannot be forgotten.

And so, for whom it might concern, here are Greaves’s Rules. Pin them up above or near the bar counter. Then even foreign visitors might stumble across some thinly understood enlightenment.

GREAVES’ RULES

  1. When two or more enter the pub together, one - usually the first through the door - will begin proceedings with the words "Now then, what are we having?" He or she will then order and pay. This purchase is known as "the first round".
  2. This player, or "opener", will remain "in the chair" while other friends or colleagues come through the door to join the round. He will remain in this benefactory role until either (a) his own glass sinks to beneath the half way mark or (b) another drinker finds himself almost bereft of his original refreshment and volunteers to "start a new round".
  3. In the absence of new arrivals, any player other than the opener may at any time inquire whether it is "the same again?" On receiving his instructions, he will then order and pay for "the second round". (N.B. The second round is the last one to be specifically numbered. Beyond that point, nobody wishes to be reminded how many they have had and, anyway, no-one should be counting.)
  4. The round acknowledges no discrimination. All players, regardless of sex, age or social status, are expected to "stand their corner". (Pedants might like to note that we are talking here of the only "round" in the English language that also contains a "corner".
  5. Any new entrant, joining the session after its inception, is not expected to "buy himself in" but should be invited to join the round by whoever is in the chair (see Rule 2). If, however, he is greeted by silence he may either (a) buy a drink just for himself or (b) attempt to buy a round for all present. If (a) or, worse still, (b) is not acceptable to the congregation then the new entrant has been snubbed and should in future seek out more appreciative company. There is one important exception...
  6. For reasons of haste or poverty, a new arrival may insist on buying his own with the words "Thanks, but I'm only popping in for one". If he is then seen to buy more than three drinks, he will be deemed a skinflint, neither broke nor in a hurry to get home, and will be penalised for his duplicity by being ordered to buy the next round.
  7. Although everyone in the group is normally required to buy at least one round before leaving, the advent of either drunkenness or closing time sometimes renders this ideal unattainable. In such circumstances, any non-paying participant will (a) have "got away with it" and (b) appoint himself "opener" at the next forgathering. However, any player who notices on arrival that the round has "got out of hand" and has no chance of reaching his turn before "the last bell", may start a "breakaway round" by buying a drink for himself and all subsequent arrivals. This stratagem breaks the round in two, keeps the cost within manageable proportions and is the only acceptable alternative to Rule 5.
  8. When a pressing engagement elsewhere precludes further involvement, it is wholly unacceptable for any player who has not yet been in the chair to buy a round in which he cannot himself be included. In such circumstances Rule 7 (a) and (b) therefore apply.
  9. In the event of any one glass becoming empty, a new round must be called immediately. This should not necessarily be called by the owner of the empty glass, however, because this place the slower drinker at an unfair fund-saving advantage. (N.B. Whereas it is permissible for any member of the round to decrease the capacity of his individual order - "just a half for me, please" - the opposite does not hold good. A large whisky, for instance, may be offered by the chair but never demanded of it.)
  10. Regional variations. In various parts of the country, a particular establishment will impose its own individual codicil. In one Yorkshire pub, for example, the landlord's Jack Russell terrier expects to be included in every round. Where such amendments exist, and are properly advertised, they must be piously observed. We are, after all, talking about a religion.

###

The Gentlemen Ranters site is a brilliant compendium of reminiscences of the great days of Fleet Street. – The Times


Issue # 148

May 28, 2010



This Week

Last week’s piece by Mike Gallemore got Mark Howard’s memory turning which – as we keep saying – is what’s supposed to happen. That is, not getting Mark thinking (which is never a bad thing) but one piece jogging somebody else’s memory, in this case about Big Lou Yaffa, Daily Mirror sub and Newcastle Utd supporter, moonlighting on the News of the Screws.

Then, going through the back numbers, John Waddell discovered that he’d been written about, and wanted to get the facts right.

Mark Day remembers that sometimes some newspapers didn’t get the facts at all, and when they did, they weren’t sure what to do with them – as in Britain declares war, see page 10…

And Linda Lovelace – there’s a name from the past – goes down, to Ascot, with Ian Bradshaw.

And if any of this stuff jogs YOUR memory, let’s hear about it. The address is up there, top right.

###

Black and white

By Mark Howard

Mention of Lou Yaffa in Ranters last week reminded me of the best ever wind-up. Lou, a fanatical Newcastle supporter, was in the chief sub’s chair at the NoW on the last day of the 1992-93 season. His team was certain to go up. No-one across the entire newsroom could be in any doubt – Lou saw to that.

I’m not sure who hatched the plan. Certainly Bob Warren and Bill Bateson were ringleaders with Alex Marunchak and Greg Miskiw heavily involved.

At the time we had a fore-runner of email: a messaging service that also ran the wire services straight to your screen. It didn’t take long before everyone learned to spoof it. Simply delete an existing message and you could over-write it convincingly. Headers, footers, the lot.

As Lou left for The Old Rose once the first edition was off stone, the first of a series of PA Snaps was forged. ‘Newcastle player fails post-match drugs test… mfl.’

On his return, with the entire paper on board, from Patsy Chapman downwards, the forged ‘snap’ hit the screens. Lou’s reaction was predicable. But still worse was to come. As reporters hit the phones (to the speaking clock, a well-honed skills in those NoW days) further bad news for Magpie supporters came thick and fast.

Snap after snap, take after take, the sorry saga of a club riddled with illegal performance-enhancing substances unfolded. The backbench solemnly debated ripping the book apart. At least five front-of-the-book pages, the splash and most of sports were binned.

Fresh pages came from the art desk with headlines that were more like darts to Lou’s soul. But, true pro that he always was, the only visible sign of his agitation was that his already phenomenal smoking rate increased to roughly 40 an hour from its usual 20.

By the time the night team came in to take over and for Lou to be chauffeured back to Manchester by Geoff Kuhillow, he was a near broken man. Keegan had quit, the FA was stripping his club of its title and no fewer than five players were exposed as drugs cheats. The great and the good of football were united in condemnation.

In the car, for the long journey home, Geoff asked if he’d like to hear the radio. Lou demurred. Just as well, really; none of us could work out which fuse was the radio’s and Geoff was unwilling to risk us deactivating something else like the lights by taking out fuses at random.

After a largely silent drive, Lou was deposited at his front gate. And as he turned to go up the path Geoff wound down the window. ‘Lou!’ he shouted. ‘That drugs story. It was all a wind-up. See you next week.’

Quite what Lou must have registered on the Richter Scale no-one witnessed. But as the most minor of irritations led to violently profane eruptions with Lou – one can but imagine it would have been truly seismic.

#

Nobody called me William

By John Waddell

Back in April in Ranters, I discover, Anthony Peagam made what, for him, was a most unusual porridge of his facts. He credited me with having given the first half of my name to a column he described as ‘John London of the Evening News’. True there was a John London column and for a couple of years I ran it but it was in the dear old News Chronicle not the Evening News. Moreover it was started while I was still slithering around on the paper's political staff failing to mimic my masters Douglas Brown and Ian Trethowan so I have no idea who dreamed up the column's name.

I later did a similar stint running the William Hickey column in the Daily Express but sadly nobody called me William which I would have rather enjoyed.

One of the interesting things about gossip columns then was that far from being deb’s delights we proved to be rather a serious bunch. On my News Chronicle team I had Patricia Rowan who finished up as the long-time editor of the Times Educational Supplement and Corinna Ascherson, at the time married to Neal Ascherson and who still pops up from time to time in the New Statesman.Then there was Mike Andrews who pioneered legal PR.

The Hickey crowd of my day spawned two of the Daily Mail’s top brass , the late Brian Vine (who had also been on the Chronicle dairy) and Robin Esser. Not a bad result.

Ranting away about the group Walter Hayes pulled from Fleet Street in the sixties to help strike-bedevilled Ford of Britain present a more cheerful face, Anthony could have added a few more names. As well as myself there was photographer Ken Denyer from the Daily Express and , a bit later, Alan Gardner (formerly editor of the Daily Mail Paul Tanfield column) and Peagam himself as well as a whole host of irregulars, Dennis Hackett and John Goldsmith among them.

Walter Hayes could at the time claim to have been the youngest ever editor of a national newspaper, the Sunday Dispatch, and his impact on Ford was immediate and lasting, helped by the fact that he became a close confidante of Henry Ford. As Walter moved up through the organisation, eventually becoming the European vice chairman, I inherited several of the jobs he vacated. He proved a very hard act to follow but the umbilical chord to Fleet Street and its progeny was a great help.

#

Meet the misses

By Mark Day

When old journos gather in bars they tend to tell stories of their greatest hits: how they solved a particularly puzzling murder; how they saved the British Empire or brought down a government.

Rarely do we hear of their greatest misses.

But we’ve all had ’em.

Ben Hills, an investigative reporter who cut his teeth at The Age in Melbourne under editor Graham Perkin, has written a biography of his mentor, Breaking News: The golden age of Graham Perkin (Scribe). In it he recalls the Dickensian days of a moribund paper in the 1950s and 60s before Perkin began its modernisation.

He recounts some tales of The Age’s better misses.

Take the story of Russell Hill, a late-stop sub editor on The Age in 1956. The paper had gone to bed, as had Russ. Well, he had nodded off, as you do in the wee small hours while the presses roll and you wait until near dawn in case something important happens.

Russ was suddenly woken by the clang of teleprinter bells – they had an alert system in those days of ringing five bells for a big breaking news story – and tore a snap off the printer. Egypt’s Colonel Nasser had ‘annexed’ the Suez Canal – a move that would take the world to the brink of World War III.

‘So what?’ Hill thought. ‘It’s already in Egypt, isn’t it?’ And he went back to sleep.

That is almost as big a miss as The Age front page in 1939. True, the front page was filled with advertisements in those days, but still, a small pointer to ‘Britain Declares War – See Page 10’ does seem to be a trifle underdone.

Missing stories was not unusual for The Age in its sad old days. Hills tells how a country correspondent’s hopeful filler alerted editors to a rather big story happening overseas. The story said that flags in Mildura were flying at half-mast as a mark of respect for the king.

‘The king?’ Hills writes. ‘Dead? Burrowing frantically through a file of overlooked cables one of the subs discovered that, while they had been knocking back beers down at the pub, George VI had died.’

I was chortling over these tales, and more, with Frank Crook, the Sydney newspaper and radio man on the day the Exile on Main Street documentary on the Rolling Stones was on TV.

‘Ah,’ said Frank. ‘London, 1964; the decade of Swinging London was just about to begin. Gerry and the Pacemakers topped the charts, The Beatles were about to rocket on to the scene and slowly making their mark was a group called the Rolling Stones.

‘I was sharing a flat in Willesden with a Daily Express photographer called Russell McPhedran, when we noticed from our front window a regular parade of young girls gathering daily outside a house directly opposite.

‘What was it all about, we wondered. Perhaps we had stumbled on a half-way house for wayward girls. We should be so lucky.

‘One day McPhedran and I drove to a local service station to check his car in for servicing. When he offered our address to the girl behind the counter she cried “Eek! You must live opposite the Rolling Stones!”

‘After we drove away, McPhedran turned to me and said: Who are the Rolling Stones? I replied, Oh they’re some kind of pop group, like The Beatles.

‘McPhedran, always on the lookout for newsworthy snaps, wondered whether it might be worth his while to stroll across the road and get the boys to pose for a couple of candids.

’I don’t know whether it would be worth the bother,’ I replied. ‘Pop groups come and go. Hardly anyone has even heard of this mob and they’ll probably sink without trace.’

‘Good call. McPhedran put his camera away and never thought about it again – except that for the past 40 years he has never let me forget it.’

#

Gives good headline

By Ian Bradshaw

With the news that Lindsay Lohan is to play Linda Lovelace in a remake of Deep Throat I fondly recall my encounter with the original in London.

It was soon after the release of the notorious film that Linda turned up in London and I was asked by John Knight’s wife Gloria if I would be interested in doing photographs for a feature on Lovelace for the News of the World. The idea was to photograph Linda and then she was to go to Royal Ascot in men’s morning dress and top hat though with just a shirt front and cravat under the coat which would pop open to reveal her topless.

I was pleasantly surprised when I met her. She was tall, quiet and not at all the raving sex maniac that many colleagues who heard about my assignment imagined. She had a great sense of humour and we got on very well.

I photographed her at her hotel (the Dorchester, I believe; memories of hotel rooms fade quickly) in various glamour situations which, as I recall, were made difficult because of numerous scars from surgery on her torso. Then on Ladies Day at Royal Ascot her Rolls Royce, registration plate PEN 15 whisked her off to the races where we let the press corps masses take over the news publicity for the daily papers. She naturally got barred from the Royal Enclosure, which was what it was all about, of course, and the publicity machine got their coverage.

I met her afterwards and she seemed quite unfazed by it all. Beneath all of the notoriety there seemed to be a very nice lady who just wanted to settle down, which she eventually did in Montauk on Long Island, NY until her death.

She did, however, return to Ascot the next day – in a Bentley this time –the registration plate? 130 LOX [Bollocks] and that, I think, is what she thought of Royal Ascot and its archaic traditions.

###

 

  Site Map